On a target with a 16-bit mask (for example), we would choose the type
of an integer literal "1024" to be an int16. Previously, we used an int32,
which is a worse fit and leads to less efficient code than an int16
on a 16-bit mask target. (However, we'd still give an integer literal
1000000 the type int32, even in a 16-bit target.)
Updated the tests to still pass with 8 and 16-bit targets, given this
change.
