? : now short-circuits evaluation of the expressions following
the boolean test for varying test types. (It already did this
for uniform tests).
Issue #169.
We now follow C's approach of evaluating these: we don't evaluate
the second expression in the operator if the value of the first one
determines the overall result. Thus, these can now be used
idiomatically like (index < limit && array[index] > 0) and such.
For varying expressions, the mask is set appropriately when evaluating
the second expression.
(For expressions that can be determined to be both simple and safe to
evaluate with the mask all off, we still evaluate both sides and compute
the logical op result directly, which saves a number of branches and tests.
However, the effect of this should never be visible to the programmer.)
Issue #4.
Switches with both uniform and varying "switch" expressions are
supported. Switch statements with varying expressions and very
large numbers of labels may not perform well; some issues to be
filed shortly will track opportunities for improving these.
ispc now supports goto, but only under uniform control flow--i.e.
it must be possible for the compiler to statically determine that
all program instances will follow the goto. An error is issued at
compile time if a goto is used when this is not the case.
The compiler now supports an --emit-c++ option, which generates generic
vector C++ code. To actually compile this code, the user must provide
C++ code that implements a variety of types and operations (e.g. adding
two floating-point vector values together, comparing them, etc).
There are two examples of this required code in examples/intrinsics:
generic-16.h is a "generic" 16-wide implementation that does all required
with scalar math; it's useful for demonstrating the requirements of the
implementation. Then, sse4.h shows a simple implementation of a SSE4
target that maps the emitted function calls to SSE intrinsics.
When using these example implementations with the ispc test suite,
all but one or two tests pass with gcc and clang on Linux and OSX.
There are currently ~10 failures with icc on Linux, and ~50 failures with
MSVC 2010. (To be fixed in coming days.)
Performance varies: when running the examples through the sse4.h
target, some have the same performance as when compiled with --target=sse4
from ispc directly (options), while noise is 12% slower, rt is 26%
slower, and aobench is 2.2x slower. The details of this haven't yet been
carefully investigated, but will be in coming days as well.
Issue #92.
Both uniform and varying function pointers are supported; when a function
is called through a varying function pointer, each unique function pointer
value across the running program instances is called once for the set of
active program instances that want to call it.
Generalize the overload resolution code to be based on estimating a
cost for various overload options and picking the one with the
minimal cost.
Add a step that considers type conversions that are guaranteed to
not lose information in function overload resolution.
Print better diagnostics when we can't find an unambiguous match.
